Warlog triages your alerts, investigates with evidence, and puts every dangerous action behind a human signature. What your team decides comes back on the next alert. What the platform did, you can verify without it.
30 minutes. A full attack, in the real console. No slides.
On Tuesday, your analyst spends three hours untangling a PowerShell case. On Thursday, the same family fires and a colleague starts from zero. Your tools saw the attack. Nobody kept what you learned.
Illustration of the precedent panel and of a rule's life. Everything else on this page is the real console.
The AI drafts each step from what its searches found, and shows how many events each one brought back. What it pulls from the logs stays tied to the step that read it. The query and the raw answer are one click away. The verdict stays with your analyst.
What did not run says so.
Across the whole environment, before anyone opens a row.
Nine checks on every technique, from does the data arrive to does the playbook run, each counted on its own. On this lab the sources have gone quiet, and the first column says so before anyone asks.
Frothly lab, snapshot of 3 November. Each check counted on its own: only 16 of the 663 have their data arriving.
Safe and reversible steps run on their own. Dangerous ones wait for an approver.
Nothing applies until a signature lands, and an author never approves their own work. Each request says why it is asked, what approving does, what rejecting does, and what was checked first.
Every model call checked against your policy, its cost attributed to a case or an alert. Agents attested, budgets that refuse, secrets and injections caught in both directions.
Frothly lab, the 7 days to 3 November.
This is not a video. Approve a dangerous action, watch it get signed phase by phase, then tamper with the record. Your browser does the math.
warlog_spec.audit_chain.compute_signature, and on your own deployment the open verifier does this without Warlog: python -m warlog_spec.verify audit.jsonl --secret-file tenant.keyA figure the platform cannot back reads not measured, and a guard in the code refuses a score that cannot say so. Your CISO can screenshot any of it.
| SOAR | Autonomous AI SOC | Warlog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who decides a dangerous action | The playbook | The model's confidence | A named person, who signs |
| What happens to the last decision | Lost in a ticket | Reprocessed from scratch | It comes back on the next alert |
| What backs a number | A dashboard | A confidence score | A measure, or "not measured" |
| What you hand your auditor | Logs to take on faith | A narrative | A signed chain, verifiable without Warlog |
| Where your data lives | Depends on the vendor | Often the vendor's cloud | In your perimeter, air-gap possible |
Warlog sits next to your stack, inside your perimeter. No shared SaaS, no pooled telemetry. No SIEM at all? The whole loop runs on its own evidence lake.
Open any card. The contract is public, the schemas are strict, and your records stay readable even if Warlog disappears.
30 minutes. The real console, from first alert to signed record.